eCMR versus eFTI
“Are we moving to eFTI or to eCMR?” is the question asked most often, and the one most often built on a misunderstanding. They are not alternatives. They regulate different things, for different parties, under different law — and you need both.
The difference in one table
Section titled “The difference in one table”| eCMR | eFTI | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An electronic consignment note | A data format plus an access infrastructure |
| Legal basis | 2008 Additional Protocol to the CMR Convention | Regulation (EU) 2020/1056 |
| Governs | The contract of carriage between consignor, carrier and consignee | How authorities may request electronic freight information |
| Evidential value | Yes — this is the document you rely on in a dispute | No — this is a channel, not a contract |
| Mandatory? | No, but it is the alternative to paper | Use is voluntary; accepting is mandatory for authorities |
| Applies where | Only between countries that ratified the Protocol | Across the EU |
| Since | 2011, per country on ratification | 9 July 2027 |
eCMR: the contract
Section titled “eCMR: the contract”The CMR Convention has governed international road carriage since 1956. The 2008 Additional Protocol says that consignment note may be electronic too, provided it carries a “reliable electronic signature”: uniquely linked to the signatory, allowing identification, under that person’s control, and such that later changes are detectable. Or any other method the law of the country of issue allows.
That “or” matters. It is why platform_auth — identification through the link, the token and
optionally a one-time code — works in practice, and why you do not need a qualified certificate for
every signature. See Signatures and trust levels.
The limitation lies elsewhere: the Protocol only applies between countries that ratified it. Drive to a country that did not and the electronic consignment note lacks its treaty basis there, so you carry a paper copy as well. Which countries those are is on Country requirements — with Belgium as the case that bites most often.
eFTI: the channel
Section titled “eFTI: the channel”eFTI solves a different problem. Until now an officer at the roadside could insist on paper, even if you had everything digitally. Regulation (EU) 2020/1056 turns that round: from 9 July 2027 authorities must accept electronic freight information when it is offered through a certified eFTI platform.
Note the asymmetry: the obligation sits with the authority, not with you. Operators are not required to use eFTI. If you choose to, it has to go through a certified platform — and then the officer has to accept it.
Technically eFTI is three layers:
- The common data set (CMDS) from delegated regulation (EU) 2024/2024, with subsets per
information requirement:
EU1(tariffs),EU2(combined transport),EU3(cabotage evidence),EU5a/b/c(ADR, RID, ADN) andEU6(air cargo), plus 27 national subsets. - The national gates from implementing regulation (EU) 2024/1942: where authorities knock, over XML and eDelivery, with every access logged for two years.
- The platform requirements from implementing regulation (EU) 2025/2243: one CMDS per consignment
with a UUID, and a UIL (Unique Identifier Link) of
gateId + platformId + datasetId, issued at the carrier’s signature and pushed to the gate’s register.
That UIL is what actually happens at the roadside: the officer gets a reference, not a file, and fetches the data from the gate.
What Cargofollow does
Section titled “What Cargofollow does”Both legs, from one POST /v1/shipments:
- eCMR today. The consignment note, the signatures, the PDF, the hash chain and the inspection link work now. In Belgium through a recognised provider, via routing — you do not have to do anything for that.
- The eFTI dataset stored already. The CMDS projection is stored with every shipment, with the right subsets for what you carry. That makes 9 July 2027 a switch for you and not a migration: the data is already there.
- Certification follows. There is no certified eFTI platform in the EU today — the certification rules themselves are not adopted yet. Once they are, Cargofollow connects, either as a certified platform or as a “tributary ICT system” attached to one.
Timeline
Section titled “Timeline”| Date | What happens | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 5 June 2011 | The e-CMR Protocol enters into force; per country from its own ratification | Done |
| 1 March 2018 | The Benelux pilot starts: e-CMR in Belgium through recognised suppliers | Done |
| 9 January 2025 | The first eFTI acts enter into force; the 30-month clock starts | Done |
| 21 May 2026 | DIWASS goes live: waste shipments go digital under Regulation (EU) 2024/1157 | Done |
| 2026 | Member states may already accept eFTI voluntarily — a national choice | Ongoing |
| October 2026 | Spain makes eCMR mandatory nationally | Expected |
| December 2026 | Certification rules and the service provider act expected | Expected |
| 8 July 2027 | Last day of the Benelux pilot | Fixed |
| 9 July 2027 | Authorities across the EU must accept eFTI | Fixed |
That 8 July and 9 July line up is no accident: the Benelux pilot was extended to exactly the day before the EU regime starts.
What you should do now
Section titled “What you should do now”- Run eCMR where you can. In the ratified countries the gain is available today. Check Country requirements for which lanes those are.
- Carry paper where you must. If your route touches a non-party country, that is not a detail but a blocker at the roadside. The rule register returns it as a finding.
- Do nothing special for eFTI. The dataset is already stored. There is nothing to connect to right now, because there is no certified platform to connect to.
- Watch the national front-runners. Spain mandates eCMR before the EU asks for anything, and several member states accept eFTI voluntarily before 2027.